Close Menu
The Reporters
  • Home
  • News
  • Politics
  • Crime
  • Health
  • Features
  • Economy
  • Environment
  • Entertainment
  • Business
  • Technology
  • Education
  • Sports
  • Tourism
  • Judiciary
  • Judiciary
  • Foreign
  • Agriculture
  • Religion
  • Weather
  • Banking
  • Labour
  • Faith
  • Advertisment
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
  • Home
  • Lifestyle
  • Travel
  • Buy Now
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest Vimeo
The Reporters
  • Home
  • News
  • Politics
  • Crime
  • Health
  • Features
  • Economy
  • Environment
  • Entertainment
  • Business
  • Technology
  • Education
  • Sports
  • Tourism
  • Judiciary
  • Judiciary
  • Foreign
  • Agriculture
  • Religion
  • Weather
  • Banking
  • Labour
  • Faith
  • Advertisment
Subscribe
The Reporters
Court

Court Lifts Order Blocking INEC from Processing Sen. Akpoti-Uduaghan’s Recall Petition

AdminBy AdminMarch 25, 2025Updated:March 25, 2025No Comments2 Mins Read
Spread the love

By Our Correspondent, Lokoja


A Federal High Court in Lokoja, Kogi State, has vacated its earlier ex-parte order restraining the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) from receiving and acting on a recall petition against Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan.

Justice Isa Dashen, who presided over the matter on Monday, set aside the interim injunction he had granted on March 20 and ordered an accelerated hearing of the substantive case.

Our correspondent recalls that on March 21, the court had issued an order barring INEC, its agents, or assigns from accepting or processing any petition containing signatures from members of Kogi Central Senatorial District aimed at recalling the senator.

It also halted any referendum that could facilitate the recall process pending the determination of the Motion on Notice.

However, INEC’s counsel, Abdullahi Aliyu (SAN), made an oral application urging the court to discharge the ex-parte injunction, arguing that the Federal High Court lacked the jurisdiction to stop a constitutional body from performing its statutory duties.

Citing the Court of Appeal decision in EFCC v. Bello, Aliyu contended that INEC’s constitutional responsibilities could not be curtailed by an interim order.

He also relied on Order 26 Rule 5(1) of the Federal High Court Rules to request an expedited hearing of the case.

Opposing the application, Sen. Akpoti-Uduaghan’s counsel, West Idahosa (SAN), argued that the court could intervene when an allegation of illegality is raised.

He maintained that a valid affidavit before the court alleged forgery, making judicial intervention necessary under Section 6(6) of the 1999 Constitution.

After considering submissions from both parties, Justice Dashen granted INEC’s application, vacated the interim order, and directed an accelerated hearing of the case.

The matter was adjourned to April 9 for further proceedings.
Edited by Dada Ahmed.

Visited 82 times, 1 visit(s) today
Previous ArticleGovernor Ododo Urged to Enforce Law on Covering Raw Materials in Transit
Next Article Next Post
Admin

Related Posts

False Claims Against Tinubu: Court Adjourns Sowore’s Arraignment to Oct. 27

September 30, 2025

Court Bars Pat Utomi from Forming “Shadow Government,” Declares Move Unconstitutional

September 29, 2025

Defamation Claim: Businessman Threatens ₦10bn Suit Against IGP, Others

September 29, 2025

Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Recent Posts
  • Ogori-Magongo Shines as Back-to-School Support Programme Flags Off
  • Ododo’s N300,000 Lifeline for Doctors: How Kogi is Tackling ‘Japa’ , Reviving Healthcare
  • Bandits Abduct Niger Electoral Commissioner, Ex-UBEB Boss, Others
  • OPWS Troops Crush Bandits, Recover Weapons in Benue
  • False Claims Against Tinubu: Court Adjourns Sowore’s Arraignment to Oct. 27
© 2025 The Reporters. Designed by Domo Tech Media .
  • Home
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Posts
  • Privacy Policy

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.